Not a bug a overview desire

Posts from previous Beta sessions

Not a bug a overview desire

Postby Taraglan » Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:35 pm

this is a google translation


member overview is (whom one sorted it on classes) something see http://rosterbeta.sf.o147.orange.fastwebserver.de/ crushing

as it out-looked it is nevertheless clearer a little here
http://roster.sf.o147.orange.fastwebserver.de/



Tara
Taraglan
WR.net Apprentice
WR.net Apprentice
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:00 pm

Not a bug a overview desire

Postby PleegWat » Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:42 pm

Please repost in original language so someone can make a real translation. Automatic translations are rarely readable.
I <3 /bin/bash
User avatar
PleegWat
WoWRoster.net Dev Team
WoWRoster.net Dev Team
 
Posts: 1636
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 1:43 pm

Re: Not a bug a overview desire

Postby Taraglan » Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:44 pm

die member übersicht ist (wen man sie auf klassen sortiert hat) etwas erdrückend siehe http://rosterbeta.sf.o147.orange.fastwebserver.de/

so wie es hier ausschaut ist es doch ein wenig übersichtlicher
http://roster.sf.o147.orange.fastwebserver.de/
Taraglan
WR.net Apprentice
WR.net Apprentice
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:00 pm

Re: Not a bug a overview desire

Postby DaarianneDarkmoon » Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:56 pm

Taraglan wrote:die member übersicht ist (wen man sie auf klassen sortiert hat) etwas erdrückend siehe http://rosterbeta.sf.o147.orange.fastwebserver.de/

so wie es hier ausschaut ist es doch ein wenig übersichtlicher
http://roster.sf.o147.orange.fastwebserver.de/

Translates into:

Member Overview seems a little bit crampt - too tight, if you sort them by class.
Example
- seems to be the R2 beta

This one looks lighter/cleaner.
-seems to be a 1.7 roster

I think this is a request to make the sorting more old-style, in class-boxes.
Taraglan seems to prefer to old way in sorting members by classes, since he belives its easier readable and not as compact... I think - trying to clarify that ;)

---
@ Taraglan und was möchtest Du jetzt genau?

Dass man es in der ursprünglichen form - einzelnen boxen - sortieren kann, so wie es im alten Roster war?
Last edited by DaarianneDarkmoon on Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DaarianneDarkmoon
WR.net Apprentice
WR.net Apprentice
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:34 am

Re: Not a bug a overview desire

Postby Taraglan » Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:08 pm

ja genau in den boxen sieht es übersichtlicher aus
Last edited by Taraglan on Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Taraglan
WR.net Apprentice
WR.net Apprentice
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:00 pm

Not a bug a overview desire

Postby Knevil » Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:45 pm

that was my first impression too, i want the old boxes back :(
User avatar
Knevil
WR.net Apprentice
WR.net Apprentice
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Not a bug a overview desire

Postby nightfighter » Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:44 pm

The good thing about this is an addon can be written to replace the member list that will sort the way it did on the older roster systems. The roster member list is an addon in 2.0, so just put in a new addon, turn it on and turn off the old one and it should work great.
User avatar
nightfighter
Roster AddOn Dev
Roster AddOn Dev
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:25 pm
Location: Boise, Idaho, USA


Return to Archived

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron