Double record

by **BreeOge** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:02 am

Me and MANY of my guild mates keep getting a dbl kill every time we kill someone. IE

Kill logged: Bruticus
Kill logged: Bruticus

I have attached the PVP DEBUG INFO. Bruticus is one of the names it happend on that I captured. Please help with this, this is very annoying.

by **BreeOge** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:57 am

After looking through the PVPlog2 I found these lines.

"06/29/08 18:19:34: PARTY_KILL, 0x00000000013E6325, Poisonlotus, 0x511, 0x000000000100A157, Bruticus, 0x10548; nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil", -- [27]
"06/29/08 18:19:34: Processing death of: Bruticus", -- [28]
"06/29/08 18:19:34: I killed Bruticus (Level 41 Night Elf Druid) at [52,26] in Tanaris (Gadgetzan).", -- [29]
"06/29/08 18:19:34: SPELL_DAMAGE, 0x00000000013E6325, Poisonlotus, 0x511, 0x000000000100A157, Bruticus, 0x10548; 26679, Deadly Throw, 1, 544, 1, nil, nil, nil", -- [30]
"06/29/08 18:19:34: recentDamaged[3]: Bruticus", -- [31]
"06/29/08 18:19:34: SPELL_CAST_SUCCESS, 0xF1300024F4002170, Gadgetzan Bruiser, 0xa48, 0x00000000013E6325, Poisonlotus, 0x511; 12024, Net, 1, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil", -- [32]
"06/29/08 18:19:35: UNIT_DIED, 0x0000000000000000, nil, 0x80000000, 0x000000000100A157, Bruticus, 0x10548; nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil", -- [33]
"06/29/08 18:19:35: Processing death of: Bruticus", -- [34]
"06/29/08 18:19:35: I killed Bruticus (Level 41 Night Elf Druid) at [52,26] in Tanaris (Gadgetzan).", -- [35]

It looks to be processing after PARTY_KILL then again after UNIT_DIED... Thus is making 2 logs about 1 kill.

by **zanix** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:26 am

Good debugging
I'm sure bsmorgan will find this quite useful when he reads it

by **BreeOge** » Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:40 am

zanix wrote:Good debugging
I'm sure bsmorgan will find this quite useful when he reads it

Is he checking the forum anymore? My post is a few weeks old now, and other than you, nobody else has posted. Honestly the PvP aspect of WoW roster is the only reason I use it. Everything else is on the wow armory. Oh well. no biggie, hope support continues for PVPLOG its a great program.

by **zanix** » Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:46 am

I see him about once a week here
Maybe in a few days he'll show up?

by **bsmorgan** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:11 am

Sorry to have been so long in responding...

Thank you very much for the debug logs as it makes it so much easier to find the bugs! To me, the most interesting part of PvPLog.lua is this line:

["version"] = "2.99.5",

The latest version of PvPLog is 3.0.0 and I think you'll find the double record bug was squished somewhere in the 5 or more versions since 2.99.5.

Try the latest version and see if it doesn't work much better for you!

Regards,

Brad

by **BreeOge** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:01 am

That was the version from this website. Fresh install of game and everything.. I will re-install it again. BTW it does seem to work for like 1 or 2 kills, then bam its back to dbl record.

I will give ya an update on it..

by **BreeOge** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:34 am

Update I re-uploaded the new PVP log to check it..

PVPlog2 has

## Interface: 20400
## Title: PvPLog2
## Author: Brad Morgan
## Version: 2.99.0

and PVPLog has

## Interface: 20400
## Title: PvPLog
## Author: Brad Morgan
## Version: 3.0.0

I will give this a go, and hope all works, I had the other PVPLog and PVPLog2 dir set to delete in uniuploader so I hope all my members no longer have the old one. For some reason i guess it didnt feel the need to update this addon *Shrugs*

by **bsmorgan** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:54 pm

The code to process PARTY_KILL combat events was removed in 2.99.9 (SVN Revision 31).

The code was fixed to properly remove PARTY_KILL events in 3.0.1. While I removed the code that was specific to PARTY_KILL, I let it fall through an elseif into a section of code that it didn't belong in causing all sorts of unknown havoc!

Please update everyone to 3.0.1 and then let me know if you have any more problems!

Regards,

Brad

by **BreeOge** » Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:22 am

thanks for taking a deeper look into this.

Double record

Double record

Re: Double record

Double record

Re: Double record

Double record

Re: Double record

Re: Double record

Double record

Double record

Re: Double record

Who is online